Four questions before a single survey question.
What decision is this for, what happens on each outcome, who counts as your market, and when it is due. The agent will not build a questionnaire around a vague wish.
Verbalab plans the study, writes the questionnaire, runs the field and reads the results. You bring the question.
What decision is this for, what happens on each outcome, who counts as your market, and when it is due. The agent will not build a questionnaire around a vague wish.
Branching runs on the server, never in the browser. Screeners cross-check declared answers against what the sample already knows, and inconsistent answers are sent back for correction instead of being recorded.
Answers land in an append-only ledger with their full history. The agent reads the base sizes, the screen-outs and the open ends, and writes what they mean for the decision you named in the brief.
A study is three parties passing one signal around. Findings feed the next brief — that is what makes it a loop, not a pipeline.
You
Bring the decision. The brief is four questions.
brief ↓
The agent
Designs the questionnaire, runs the field, reads the results.
questionnaire ↓ answers ↑
Your market
Real people answering one question per screen.
record · read · findings ↺

What the sample already knows about a respondent gates what they can be asked and what they can claim. Bad rows never get written.
Name two reasons and the next screen asks about the ones you did not name. Option lists derive from earlier answers on the server, and the removed options are refused on the wire too.
A total that does not match its parts comes back to the screen with a sentence, not into the data.
Questions carry a semantic identity across versions, so wave two is comparable with wave one by construction.
Close the tab, come back, land on the same question with your answers intact. Plain language, one question per screen.
Two decades of field-tested survey methodology, rebuilt as software. These are the guarantees the data rests on.